tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4335908177719535466.post5862831028649112840..comments2024-02-10T12:05:30.851-07:00Comments on Anti-Racist Canada: The ARC Collective: Christie and Fromm seek intervenor status in BC polygamy trialUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4335908177719535466.post-39676221789042485122010-02-12T16:40:56.774-07:002010-02-12T16:40:56.774-07:00alot of commenters miss other points in the discus...alot of commenters miss other points in the discussion..for example.. legal polygamy screws up property rights in Canada and also the "right to speedy divorce"..because people in multiple conjugal unions will wait and wait and wait.. for one spouse to divorce first..before settling with another spouse.. for property rights..<br />Only Saskatchewan Canada allows polygamy and each (2) cases where they have legalized Canadian polygamy has caused incredible screwing of property between so called "extra" spouses". Get a divorce before getting another spouse and everything works then...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4335908177719535466.post-6314632891929576142010-02-04T20:59:26.259-07:002010-02-04T20:59:26.259-07:00Whose freedom and whose choices? Freedom does not ...Whose freedom and whose choices? Freedom does not include the right to rape and coerce. Nor can a "choice" be said to have been made, in the absence of other choices. Try growing up female in a polygamous cult and doing anything other than continuing that legacy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4335908177719535466.post-16874460238471895402010-02-01T15:52:48.389-07:002010-02-01T15:52:48.389-07:00It should be up to the individual and not the stat...It should be up to the individual and not the state to decide on issues like this. Freedom includes the freedom to make wrong choices. We don't need civil servants defining morality for us, especially when they make a living from doing so.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4335908177719535466.post-89051804897614488532010-01-30T10:09:57.765-07:002010-01-30T10:09:57.765-07:00My 2 cents.
Fromm is a publicity craving racist ko...My 2 cents.<br />Fromm is a publicity craving racist kook. <br />His lawyer isn't much better.<br /><br /> Actually the two of them make a luverly couple.<br /><br /> I think that aside from the publicity, these white supremacist types want to see some kind of law that sanctions polygamy, but only for white men and women to "preserve their race." <br /><br />Yeah, I think he's THAT nuts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4335908177719535466.post-58403451416722874772010-01-28T16:11:21.995-07:002010-01-28T16:11:21.995-07:00Aw. I appreciate the people of CAFE very much, but...Aw. I appreciate the people of CAFE very much, but Polygamy? C'mon...<br />After all of these years of hearing/reading from members of CAFE and a number of their supporters that, "marriage is designed to unite man and woman... gay marriage is an abomination to God..." etc., I wouldn't have expected this. If I recall correctly, biblical scriptures strongly enforce faithful unity between one man and one woman, thus, nullifying the practices of homosexuality, infidelity/adultery and polygamy (Biblical scriptures may have mentioned polygamists such as King Solomon, but don't appear to endorse that lifestyle at all, especially as King Solomon's hundreds of wives turned him away from God) <br />In my opinion, this scenario should be treated in the same way that gay marriage and infidelity/adultery would be treated by its opposition, in all fairness (and also if CAFE and its supporters love Christ so much, as to continually address with contempt, Islam and Judaism's alleged anti-Christian doctrine as attacks against our nation and its founding values) <br /><br />People must mind their representations and reputations carefully, and avoid contradictions of these to the best of their ability, especially when assuming the positions and roles that they have!LettucePreynoreply@blogger.com